{"id":2286,"date":"2015-06-15T20:07:44","date_gmt":"2015-06-16T00:07:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.complejidadsocial.udd.cl\/?p=2286"},"modified":"2015-06-15T20:07:44","modified_gmt":"2015-06-16T00:07:44","slug":"conference-of-morality-cognitive-and-evolutionary-origins","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gobierno.udd.cl\/cics\/2015\/06\/15\/conference-of-morality-cognitive-and-evolutionary-origins\/","title":{"rendered":"Conference on Morality: Cognitive and Evolutionary Origins"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Cerebro_udd\"<\/p>\n

Santiago, Chile
\nJuly 29 \u2013 August 1, 2015<\/h3>\n

Atoms have no morality, physics has no morality\u2014so why do humans have morality? This conference explores the cognitive foundations and evolutionary origins of moral reasoning, moral judgments, and moral emotions.<\/p>\n

Human social life is steeped in moral concepts (right <\/em>versus wrong<\/em>, obligation<\/em>, cheater<\/em>, trustworthy<\/em>, free rider<\/em>), moral judgments (fair<\/em>, unjust, entitled, praiseworthy, punishable, forbidden<\/em>); proto-moral sentiments (empathy<\/em>, altruism<\/em>, disgust<\/em>); and full-blown moral emotions (indignation<\/em>, anger<\/em>, guilt<\/em>, gratitude, outrage<\/em>). A new field, moral psychology, is investigating the genesis and content of these concepts, judgments, and sentiments. This lively multidisciplinary area brings together psychologists, biologists, economists, sociologists, anthropologists, political scientists, neuroscientists, primatologists, and experimental philosophers. Their research seeks to understand how people produce moral judgments (i.e., which mental and social mechanisms are involved) and why those mechanisms evolved. It brings the methods of science to bear on questions that were once the sole province of the humanities. Is morality the product of pure reason, an arbitrary social construct, or a deep expression of human nature? Do infants have moral intuitions, or are we born amoral creatures? How do moral sentiments and moral cognition shape relationships among family, friends, and romantic partners? Within groups, coalitions, communities, and nations?<\/p>\n

A growing body of research suggests that the human mind has a rich evolved architecture, which is interlaced with mechanisms producing judgments, reasoning, and emotions that we recognize as involving morality. This new understanding is provoking scholars in the social sciences and humanities to revisit key questions. Do moral concepts, judgments, and emotions arise from religious, political, economic, legal, and cultural institutions\u2014from churches, courts, elections, property laws, social norms, banks, marriage, and other social arrangements? Or do evolved moral sentiments shape these social institutions, defeating some and making others stable? Or both? If evolved moral emotions exist, how does this connect to moral philosophy? Does research on moral psychology enrich moral philosophy or undercut it?<\/p>\n

It casts new light on public life too. Moral sanctioning occurs when two people interact, in group interactions among many, and when groups interact with one another. It arises when people watch and judge third parties, and works its way up to the whole of society. Morality is the basis upon which political doctrines are built, making morality the cornerstone on which public policies rest. This makes research on the psychology and biology of morality relevant to political debates, social dilemmas, value considerations, religious disputes, and other topics which currently attract public attention.<\/p>\n

Given the subject\u2019s importance, touching everyday current problems which go beyond pure science, the conference\u2019s organizers conceived this meeting as a unique occasion to explore the current state of that research program, through talks and discussions from some of its major contributors and participants. The speakers, drawn from the US, South America, Europe, and Asia, include the following scholars.<\/p>\n